Angelo Taningco
Economist, Treasury Group
Overseas Filipinos (OF) remittances grew marginally in Q1 as its lower inflows from the Middle East—amid repatriation of OF workers from the region and deployment ban to Kuwait—almost eclipsed relatively sharp increases from certain host countries (ex. US, Canada, Germany, Japan, Malaysia). We contend that its anemic growth coupled with a sharp widening in the trade-in-goods deficit led the balance of payments (BOP) deficit to succumbed to a five-quarter high in Q1 and in turn led the peso to depreciate the most amongst Asian currencies. On the other hand, our estimate of the OF cash remittance-to-GDP ratio portrays a relatively high share in Q1, suggesting that households may have likely depended more on remittances for spending purposes, taking advantage of the peso’s weakness and to combat accelerating inflation. We expect OF remittances to rebound in subsequent months as the high base effects fade, thus, retaining our full-year 2018’s 5.0% growth forecast.
OF cash remittances growth slowed to 0.8% yoy in Jan-Mar from 7.1% in Jan-Feb due to its March’s 9.8% drop, which the BSP attributed to lesser banking days amid the Holy Week as well as repatriation of OF workers from the Middle East. We expect it to rebound in April and in subsequent months, however, as the high base effect fades. Meanwhile, its Q1 total of $7.0 billion was eclipsed by the trade-in-goods deficit of $8.7b in the same period; we think the gap between the trade deficit and OF cash remittances was partly responsible for the BOP deficit to widen to $1.2b in Q1, implying that the current account may have likely been in a deficit position as well. We have argued that the BOP deficit was largely responsible for the 4.3% peso depreciation year-to-date through end-Mar, enabling the peso’s weakness to be the sharpest amongst most Asian currencies.
But we also contend that OF cash remittance inflows as a share of GDP rose in Q1; we estimate it to be at 9.3%, which we found to be the highest since Q2 2017 and above the annual averages of previous years. This tells us that households may have likely increased their dependence on remittances for their spending needs, potentially taking advantage of the peso’s weakness and to combat rising inflationary pressures.
Figure: OF Cash Remittances
(percent of GDP)

Disclosures Appendix
This material is confidential and intended for suitable counterparties. The data and information provided in this report accurately reflect the personal views of the specialists or were obtained from public sources believed to be reliable. No representation or warranty as to its accuracy or completeness, express or implied is hereby made, and the investor should not rely thereon without making any independent analysis or research on any topic therein. Any opinion or advice expressed herein may change without notice.
This report is not to be taken as an offer to sell or buy securities or any investment. Security Bank Corporation denies any liability that may arise out of any loss or may result in actual, direct or consequential damage from the use or reliance on any material hereof. Reproduction of this material, whether in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of Security Bank Corporation. Security Bank Corporation, its directors, officers or staff or any of its subsidiary or affiliates may have taken a short or long position in any investments or securities mentioned herein upon the presentation of this report and may buy or sell the investments or securities at any time in the open market or otherwise, either as broker, dealer, principal or agent. You hereby acknowledge that you have read and understood this Disclaimer and agree to be bound by the conditions therein.
