Angelo Taningco
Economist, Treasury Group
Philippine merchandise trade deficit expanded more-than-expected to $3.7b in May (market consensus: $3.5b), the widest negative trade gap since the start of the year. Exports fell for the fifth-straight month, incurring a 3.8% yoy decline while import growth was again in double-digits at 11.4% yoy. In Jan-May, cumulative trade deficit totaled $15.8b, which is 55% larger compared to the same period last year. We expect the trade deficit to persist and to grow this year as the global trade war and the country’s widening inflation differential vis-à-vis its trading partners will suppress an export rebound and will strengthen import demand for capital goods (ex. machinery) as well as raw materials and intermediate goods (ex. iron and steel). We maintain our full-year trade-in-goods deficit and end-year USD/PHP forecasts at $32b and 53.25, respectively, with the risks to our trade and foreign exchange projections both tilted to the upside.
The bigger cumulative trade deficit was on account of weak export supply performance and strong import demand. Exports were down 5% yoy in Jan-May due to a sharp contraction in exports of agro-based products (−26% yoy) and a decline in manufactured goods (−4.7% yoy), the latter accounting for 84% of total export proceeds. We posit that part of the reason for the anemic export performance is domestic demand catching up with domestic production. This is probably apparent in the manufacturing sector in which despite its robust output performance, local demand for manufactured products has intensified fueled by vibrant business spending. This is also evident in the agriculture sector where low productivity and adverse weather conditions have disrupted food supply that led to a contraction in agro-based exports. Conversely, cumulative imports were larger 10.9% yoy in Jan-May on relatively strong import demand for capital goods (11.6% yoy), consumer goods (9.5% yoy), and raw materials and intermediate goods (9.1% yoy). We assert the country’s strong business investment and aggressive government spending amid its infrastructure push have led to more robust import demand for capital goods (ex. telecom equipment and electrical machinery) as well as raw materials and intermediate goods (ex. iron and steel). Furthermore, healthy household consumption—buttressed by income tax cuts, steady OF remittance inflows and tourism receipts—has positively contributed to import demand.
We also conjecture that the widening inflation differential between the Philippines and its major trading partners may have also spurred the trade deficit to grow further; this is because as the country’s inflation increases more vis-à-vis its trading partners, its exportable items will incur a loss in its international competitiveness position while making importable items relatively more attractive.
The global trade war, we think, could potentially expand the country’s trade deficit. China is the biggest import source and third-largest export market of the Philippines. Global tariffs on aluminum and steel may lead China to export more of these products to the Philippines. Moreover, US tariffs on Chinese goods that contain “industrially significant technologies” may dampen Philippine exports of electronic parts and components (semiconductors) to China.
Figure: Merchandise Trade

Disclosures Appendix
This material is confidential and intended for suitable counterparties. The data and information provided in this report accurately reflect the personal views of the specialists or were obtained from public sources believed to be reliable. No representation or warranty as to its accuracy or completeness, express or implied is hereby made, and the investor should not rely thereon without making any independent analysis or research on any topic therein. Any opinion or advice expressed herein may change without notice.
This report is not to be taken as an offer to sell or buy securities or any investment. Security Bank Corporation denies any liability that may arise out of any loss or may result in actual, direct or consequential damage from the use or reliance on any material hereof. Reproduction of this material, whether in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the prior consent of Security Bank Corporation. Security Bank Corporation, its directors, officers or staff or any of its subsidiary or affiliates may have taken a short or long position in any investments or securities mentioned herein upon the presentation of this report and may buy or sell the investments or securities at any time in the open market or otherwise, either as broker, dealer, principal or agent. You hereby acknowledge that you have read and understood this Disclaimer and agree to be bound by the conditions therein.
